I'm sure the RRS devices are very good too, like their other products. The price is reasonable, the quality is high, and the manufacturers are very helpful. Regarding hardware, I am a big fan of Nodal Ninja. It's really not a big deal to drag and drop your files right out of Bridge or other browser into PT Gui. But even that process, fun as it is to watch, is terribly time-consuming. But the program takes a very long time to redraw previews after corrections are entered, and I lose track of how my entries affect the result.ĪutoPano strongly markets its ability to find relevant files in a folder and organize them for stitching. I'm sure that's more my fault than the software's-I need to read the directions better.
Ptgui pro how to#
Second, I was just never able to figure out how to manipulate the control points in AutoPano.
Ptgui pro windows#
First, because it runs on my Windows machine easily five times faster than the other, even when using the Smartblend plug-in.
Ptgui pro pro#
I have tried AutoPano Pro and PT Gui Pro, but now use PT Gui almost exclusively. (I'll propose a radical notion about that in a moment.) PT Gui has always impressed me with its ability to smoothly blend seemingly impossible variations in the density of joined edges. Regarding a later posting showing blending problems with PT Gui, I was surprised to see it. If I need to make corrections to an individual file, I find it much easier to use ACR or a Photoshop plug-in like PT Lens ( ) I should add that I do not practise what I just preached. Check this tutorial for more and better information: Otherwise, I believe, you have to enter figures numerically as you would with its ancestor, Pano Tools.
Ptgui pro full#
One trick is to give it a full 360 degree row of pictures to work on so that it can figure out the corrections needed for a successful blend, and then you can apply those corrections to the original files. As to the original question about whether PT Gui Pro can correct for vignetting, I'm pretty sure it can.
Here's what might be the best to way fix Justan's existing panorama. So maybe the extra post processing is justified.Īnd yes yes, the clipping gizmo is not stricly needed on the bottom-most layer. The problem with the dang raw converters is you can't see your images butted up against each other, with the above technique you can. But no real panographer will ever rely on this technique as his major pre-blending strategy, without first suffering through trying to obtain best possible equalization in his raw converter. jpg's by some poorly informed panographer. This technique is also good if your pano was shot it in. Then select all the layers and unleash CS4's Edit->Auto Blend function.
Then flatten the individual control layer + image pairs (not the whole image!) which in the example would leave 4 layers. Then have at it with the control layers until the hard edge wall between images becomes near-seamlessly invisible. Individually Alt-click on each of the new control layers to make them clipping layers that will only affect the image layer right underneath it. Then click the yin-yang symbol at the bottom of the Layers panel create a Levels or Curves control layer just above each image layer. One image layer at a time, CTRL-click on the image's mask to create a selection. When using PTGui each layer will also have a mask. So as a final ring of defense against blending errors, from your stitcher output the panels as a layered 16 bit psd or psb. Here's what might be the best to way fix Justan's existing panorama.Įven if you do your absolute best to create a smoothly transitioning set of pano->TIF raw conversions, there is still going to be some panel to panel inconsistency. All here have helped to further my knowledge of stitching.Īnd the beat goes on. The kinds of contribution provided are the purest form of synergy and reflects the highest goals of this web site, if not the highest goals of any group committed to education.ĭue to your assistance I've been able to get past some of the program’s quirks and more importantly to me, have been able to take advantage of this complex tool to help achieve some pretty good results. You have helped both myself and I hope anyone else who wanders into this specialty who may come across this and other threads covering the many aspects of stitching. The willingness of yourselves to help with work arounds and to help fill out my admittedly thin knowledge in this area – and to share experiences is, simply stated, invaluable. The study has lead me to tools such as PTGui that have considerable ability but are not without their quirks. Working with panos, so I'm learning, is a formal study familiar only to a small group. I will once again extend my sincere thinks to you - and to all - for your generous contributions not only of your knowledge but of your time. But I will neither disparage or patronize you in reply. I have no idea what you mean by this comment.
0 kommentar(er)
